You are here: Faculty & Research » Publications
Our success relies on the brain and heart of our institution – the faculty. Composed of internationally renowned and highly motivated full and assistant professors, their productiveness is widely demonstrated by more than 500 journal publications in the last five years.
What implications does managerial research have for practice? What are tangible and relevant results of research projects? Please find below a condensed presentation of three current scientific studies as well as the current version of our Faculty Profile with the CVs and significant publications of all Mannheim business faculty members.
Laura Marie Schons, Professor of Corporate Social Responsibility at the University of Mannheim, Business School
Customers’ Mixed Feelings About CSR - The Danger of Negative Price Fairness Perceptions
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is not always received well. Customers may expect companies to roll over the costs for CSR engagements into prices. With the right CSR strategy, companies can ensure favorable perceptions of their CSR activities.
When firms invest in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), they usually expect positive reactions of business partners and clients. However, a favorable perception of firms’ CSR engagement cannot be taken for granted. This is one of the major conclusions of a recent study co-authored by Laura Marie Schons, Professor of Corporate Social Responsibility. “Warm glow or extra charge?” – The title of the study suggests that stakeholders do not always believe that CSR engagements benefit them. “Under certain conditions, customers believe suppliers who engage in CSR charge unfair prices,” explains Professor Schons. “Our findings should raise red flags for CSR and PR managers.”
“Customers might question the fairness of the firm's pricing policy.“
There is no disputing that CSR engagements such as corporate donations and responsible supply chain practices offer many advantages. Prior research shows CSR activities create desirable outcomes, as, e.g., an enhanced customer loyalty. Yet, the new findings of Schons’ study reveal a more mixed perception of CSR: Customers do not appreciate companies’ CSR engagement per se.
The study relies on qualitative and quantitative data from more than 4,000 customers and reveals how the nature of their perceptions depends on CSR attributions. These should be effectively managed: “CSR activities should be designed and communicated in a way to reflect the company’s genuine concern for being socially responsible,” suggests Schons. Companies must succeed in convincing their customers that their CSR engagement results from intrinsic motives rather than from an egoistic objective to gain a competitive advantage. Customers evaluate a supplier’s price fairness more positively only if they perceive such a genuine concern.
However, implementing an effective CSR strategy is easier said than done. Recent opinion polls reveal that 75% of customers are highly skeptical of corporate communications in general and CSR communications in particular. Therefore, Schons’ study recommends a second strategy: Companies should explain where the budget for the CSR engagement comes from. Consider, for example, a supplier who communicates how it finances CSR activities from a cut of top management salaries.
In such a case, customers will be much less inclined to think the supplier marked up its prices. Consequently, they will not discount the fairness of the supplier’s prices. Professor Schons concludes: “Transparency in communication ensures CSR communications are processed less skeptically. Customers experience the ‘warm glow’ of purchasing from a socially responsible company and perceive their suppliers’ prices as fair.”
Habel, Johannes, Schons, Laura Marie, Alavi, Sascha and Wieseke, Jan, Warm Glow or Extra Charge? The Ambivalent Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Customers’ Perceived Price Fairness, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 80 No. 1, January 2016.
About Laura Marie Schons
Laura Marie Schons is Professor of Corporate Social Responsibility at the University of Mannheim, Business School. Her research interests focus on employee and consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility, CSR management, CSR communication, as well as innovative pricing mechanisms and business models. Before joining Mannheim, she worked as a postdoctoral researcher at the Sales and Marketing Department of the Ruhr University Bochum, where she finished her doctoral thesis in 2011.
Christoph Schneider, Assistant Professor in the Finance department of the University of Mannheim, Business School
Gut Feelings Often Trigger Investment Decisions - CEOs are Betting with Shareholder’s Money
CEOs often trust their gut feelings when it comes to investment decisions. They prefer “lotteries” with a small chance of a big profit over better projects with a big chance of a moderate gain. In the long run, this behavior leads to a destruction of shareholder value.
Strategies for investment decisions have been the subject of many research projects in the past. With overwhelming evidence, these studies conclude that relying on rational valuation tools to make investment decisions is the best choice. Intuitive reasoning leads to biased decision-making and a distortion of optimal capital allocation, resulting in a reduction of shareholder wealth.
Christoph Schneider is co-author of a recent study that was published in the renowned Journal of Finance in April 2016. Together with Oliver Spalt from Tilburg University, he analyzes a powerful behavioral phenomenon: the tendency of CEOs of big corporations to invest in lottery-style projects with large potential payoffs, even if the probability of success is low.“ CEOs systematically put too much money in projects with a high potential upside, even if there is only a small possibility to obtain a high profit“ Christoph Schneider explains. His analysis supports prior survey-based research, which reveals that about 40% of surveyed US-CEOs make capital allocation decisions with very little or no input from others and more than 50% consider gut feeling as important for their investment decision.
“Intuitive reasoning is a serious problem in many firms.“
The study reveals that CEOs prefer investing in high-risk projects over investing in safer options, because it feels especially good to win big. This intuitive preference for lottery-type payoffs leads them astray. “CEOs systematically dismiss projects with high chances of a moderate gain,” Schneider explains. “Our paper shows that investment decisions biased towards long shots may indeed be a serious problem in many firms.“
In addition, Schneider and Spalt provide evidence that younger CEOs even have a stronger preference for betting on long shots than older ones. They also show that this behavior is more likely in firms with weak corporate governance, in which CEOs are very powerful and their decisions are not sufficiently questioned by the board of directors.
Finally, the researchers determine a correlation with cultural factors and social norms. Religious beliefs and gambling-norms in the region where headquarters are located appear to be influential. CEOs are taking ’longer shots‘ in regions with more Catholic believers which have been shown by previous research to be more lenient towards gambling and in regions where people participate more in lotteries. The study concludes that behavioral biases like CEOs’ preference for long shots can lead to inefficiencies in internal capital markets that are very costly to shareholders.
Schneider, Christoph and Spalt, Oliver G., Conglomerate Investment, Skewness, and the CEO Long Shot Bias, Journal of Finance, Vol. 71 No. 2, April 2016.
ABOUT CHRISTOPH SCHNEIDER
Christoph Schneider studied Economics and Management Science at the Humboldt University in Berlin and received his doctoral degree from the University of Mannheim. Since 2010, he has been Assistant Professor in the Finance department of the University of Mannheim, Business School. He also taught as a Visiting Assistant Professor at the University of Michigan.
Dirk Ifenthaler, Chair of Economic and Business Education, Learning, Design and Technology at the University of Mannheim, Business School
Corporate Open Online Courses - High Interest, Low Acceptance
Many employees report interest in corporate open online courses (COOCs). More than 85% would attend a COOC for professional purposes. However, only about 40% believe their employer would value a COOC-based participation certificate. As such, much of the potential of COOCs as tools for vocational education and workplace learning remains unutilized.
“The potential of corporate open online courses, so called COOCs, for vocational education and workplace learning has so far not been researched extensively,” states learning-technologies expert Dirk Ifenthaler. The results of the current research projects he carries out together with a research group focusing on Learning, Design and Technology contribute to closing this research gap. His ongoing studies on the topic already reveal that employees are open for professional training through online courses. However, their efforts are often not appreciated by their superiors.
„COOCS are far from being a second wave of the online learning revolution.”
The majority of the participants in his study would be willing to attend an open online course. For private purposes, at least more than 50% show interest in an online course. Provided that the course content ist work-related, more than 85% of the surveyed employees would participate. A bonus or paid leave is usually expected. Providing these incentives would raise employees’ willingness to participate even more.
Looking at the success of digital learning in higher education, where massive open online courses (MOOCs) of leading universities attract thousands of viewers per lecture, digital learning could be considered similarly beneficial in the professional field. This observation is corroborated by the fact that interest in online education for professional development is even higher than for private educational purposes. However, so far only few businesses use COOCs as an on-the-job training tool. In many companies, managers have yet to accept COOCs as reliable and beneficial.
Only 41% of the surveyed employees expect adequate appreciation by their superiors and even fewer (27%) feel COOC-based credentials help them to certify their knowledge and competencies. To make use of COOCs as learning tools in companies, the neglection of further education accomplishments earned online must come to an end.
By failing to establish COOCs in their firms, managers miss out an important opportunity, as Professor Ifenthaler explains: “Compared to tailormade inhouse trainings, COOCs are relatively inexpensive. They can be customized for almost any requirement and, as our study shows, they are widely accepted by employees.” COOCs might be a common professional learning tool in the future. “But for now, they are far from being a second wave of the online learning revolution.”
Ifenthaler, Dirk, Bellin-Mularski, Nicole and Mah, Dana-Kristin, Internet: Its impact and its potential for learning and instruction. In J. M. Spector (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of educational technology, Vol. 1, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2016.
About Dirk Ifenthaler
Dirk Ifenthaler received his doctoral degree in Education Science from the University of Freiburg and conducted further research as a Fulbright Scholar-in-Residence at the University of Oklahoma. Before accepting a position as Professor of Applied Teaching and Learning Research at the University of Potsdam, he was Professor of Digital Learning at Deakin University in Australia. Professor Ifenthaler has held the Chair of Economic and Business Education, Learning, Design and Technology at the University of Mannheim, Business School, since 2015.